<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TorqueBox 2 Migration Notes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://screamingcoder.com/life/2012/06/20/torquebox-2-migration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://screamingcoder.com/life/2012/06/20/torquebox-2-migration/</link>
	<description>fax machine anthems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2026 19:12:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://screamingcoder.com/life/2012/06/20/torquebox-2-migration/comment-page-1/#comment-2680</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 22:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screamingcoder.com/life/?p=284#comment-2680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Lance. In hindsight I think I just misinterpreted the docs. I read &lt;a href=&quot;http://torquebox.org/documentation/2.0.3/torquebox-cmd.html#torquebox-cmd-deploy&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this section&lt;/a&gt; as:

ROOT can be (directory containing the application you want to deploy), (a -knob.yml file), ...

Versus:

ROOT can be directory containing (the application you want to deploy), (a -knob.yml file), ...

I use different knob files for different environments. I guess I could put them into different directories, but do you think it would be reasonable to allow deployment of a knob file directly? Happy to raise a feature request if so.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Lance. In hindsight I think I just misinterpreted the docs. I read <a href="http://torquebox.org/documentation/2.0.3/torquebox-cmd.html#torquebox-cmd-deploy" rel="nofollow">this section</a> as:</p>
<p>ROOT can be (directory containing the application you want to deploy), (a -knob.yml file), &#8230;</p>
<p>Versus:</p>
<p>ROOT can be directory containing (the application you want to deploy), (a -knob.yml file), &#8230;</p>
<p>I use different knob files for different environments. I guess I could put them into different directories, but do you think it would be reasonable to allow deployment of a knob file directly? Happy to raise a feature request if so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lance Ball</title>
		<link>http://screamingcoder.com/life/2012/06/20/torquebox-2-migration/comment-page-1/#comment-2679</link>
		<dc:creator>Lance Ball</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 12:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screamingcoder.com/life/?p=284#comment-2679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great article - thanks! Just one note. When deploying with `torquebox deploy [site]` the [site] parameter should be a directory, and it defaults to the current working directory. So your arg of myapp-knob.yml may have been a contributor to the error here. Not really sure, but in general deploying with `torquebox deploy` should work just fine in 2.0.3.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article &#8211; thanks! Just one note. When deploying with `torquebox deploy [site]` the [site] parameter should be a directory, and it defaults to the current working directory. So your arg of myapp-knob.yml may have been a contributor to the error here. Not really sure, but in general deploying with `torquebox deploy` should work just fine in 2.0.3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
